Religiosity is actually found to be the best predictor out-of intimate prejudice inside our analyses

Religiosity is actually found to be the best predictor out-of intimate prejudice inside our analyses

Hence, i restricted the analyses so you’re able to participants’ thinking on the homosexual some one, as opposed to specific attitude contrasting between homosexual visitors

Extremely Puerto Ricans pursue particular interpretation of Christian lifestyle. Offered Christianity’s position toward homosexuality because the a wicked life, this is simply not alarming to acquire an effective bad connection ranging from religiosity and you may sexual prejudice (Diaz, 1998; Company, 1995). Also, i asked if religiosity you’ll increase intimate prejudice of the broadening participants’ moral resistance to interact that have homosexual some body and/otherwise perceive one affairs having gay individuals since positive. Still, an architectural design with religiosity anticipating intimate prejudice alongside the most other studies parameters was discovered to be unsound and erratic. Thus, we do not faith religiosity is the riding foundation for everybody other research details. While you are an input to cut back individuals’ religiosity are shady, we do strongly recommend open discussions from Christianity’s stance towards the intimate positioning in place of homosexual habits contained in this spiritual options (Choice, Serafini, Rabkin, Remien, & Williams, 1994). Such circumstances will get clean out Puerto Rican’s negative thinking for the homosexual males and you will lady by removing the focus out of stigma in the homosexual private to a specific intimate conclusion.

In the end, we American dating site discover no intercourse differences in this new connectivity anywhere between intimate prejudice plus the study details. Nevertheless, its lack of intercourse huge difference may be because of our very own dimension regarding intimate bias. The difference in item content within our ATL and you may ATG subscales create perfect comparisons among them subscales unfeasible. Earlier studies seeking sex variations in perceptions to the homosexuality adjusted the ATLG goods text are the same with the exception of the new resource class (i.age., “[Male/Female] homosexuality was a perversion.”) (Herek, 2002a). On the other hand, probably the variations in sexual prejudice for our research society is maybe not due to a sex dichotomy however, in order to variations across the intercourse opportunities (Sakalli, 2002). Males having greater salience from inside the machismo and in the thinking away from masculinity would be to render greater intimate prejudice certainly one of men (Cunningham, 1998). Coming lookup is talk about how item text, social opinions, and you may gender variations ong Puerto Ricans.

Still, reviews between all of our design therefore the choice model suggest that religiosity, confident experiences with gay someone, and you can quantity of connections having gay males and lesbian forecast intimate prejudice much better than new choice causal station

Our very own research has numerous limitations. Very first, the fresh study’s cross-sectional analysis minimal the organization temporary ordering your variables. Coming research will be talk about this new causal dating between the research parameters. Next, economic and you can capital restrictions diminished the ability to collect a bigger shot. A larger test which can be broke up inside the random halves can get allow for more changes getting generated using one half the fresh take to, while assessment the brand new completely-modified design throughout the most other haphazard half. Third, data conclusions could be low-generalizable to own Puerto Rican low-university populations. Although members appeared motivated to take part in the study, past search discover people with lowest informative attainment tend to get highest towards the intimate bias (Herek, 2002). Next, we failed to find out in the event that professionals interacted having gay men otherwise lesbians exactly who self-shared the intimate orientation or if perhaps it believed males and you may females was homosexuals. Fifth, all of our failure to assess what amount of people absent contained in this for each and every class room into the questionnaire restrictions this new review regarding possible visibility biases. However, once the studies collection took place at the beginning of this new session, we think the chances of dropouts and you may youngsters not attending lecture might have reduced. Fundamentally, religiosity’s affect sexual bias is worth better mining. Our very own analysis try unable to collect information regarding participants’ spiritual affiliations. Because of the range off Christian life (85% Roman Catholic and you may 15% Protestant and other; CIA Business Factbook (2005)), coming education should talk about whether religiosity’s effect on intimate prejudice may vary by spiritual lifestyle.

Trả lời

Email của bạn sẽ không được hiển thị công khai. Các trường bắt buộc được đánh dấu *